Srimani Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44180 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2021 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

SRIMANI DEVI W/o Shailesh Sharma Resident of Village - Ginji, P.S.- Ghosi in the distt. of Jehanabad.

2.

Jhunni Devi @ Jhunni Kumari W/o Sonu Sharma Resident of Village - Ginji, P.S.- Ghosi in the distt. of Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-05-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 452, 325 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently Section 302 of the IPC was added, registered in connection with Ghosi P.S.Case No. 124 of 2021. When the informant had returned from PMCH on 10.03.2021, he saw his mother in injured condition and unconscious. He also saw a bullet near the injured. The injured

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44180 of 2021(3) dt.12-05-2022 2/2 apprised the informant that the present petitioners had badly assaulted the injured. The injured died during the course of treatment.

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the deceased was an old lady of 80 years and she died due to some ailments.

On the other hand, the learned APP has submitted that there is specific allegation against the petitioners that they badly assaulted the deceased and she died during the course of treatment.

Considering the above facts and circumstances, especially the fact that the petitioners are the direct assailants, I do not find it a fit case for anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners is hereby rejected. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time as provided hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T