Krishna Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary Urban Development Department, Government Of Bih

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3215 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14675 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Krishna Kumar and Ors Son of Late Bindeshwari Singh, Resident of Mohalla-Krishna Nagar, Rajabazar, Police Station-Jehanabad in the District of Jehanabad.

2.

Vivekanand Sharma, Son of Late Mod Narayan Sharma, Resident of Mohalla-Satsang Nagar, Road No.1, Lane No.2, Police Station-Jehanabad in the District of Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary Urban Development Department, Government Of Bih 2.

The Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Chief Engineer, Urban Development, Government of BIhar, Patna. 5.

The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya namely Ms. T.N. Bindeshwari 6.

The District Magistrate, Jehanabad namely Mr. Alok Ranjan Ghosh 7.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Jehanabad.

8.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Jehanabad. 9.

The Circle Officer, Jehanabad.

10.

The Nagar Parishad, Jehanabad through the Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Jehanabad.

11.

The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Jehanabad. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Prasad Sinha Aag 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 20-06-2024 Learned counsel for the respondent submitted on instruction read with the show cause filed on behalf of the

Patna High Court MJC No.3215 of 2018(6) dt.20-06-2024 2/2 Opposite Party No. 2 to the extent that orders of this court has been complied. It is being disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The present M.J.C contempt is pending consideration for the last about six years. Therefore we proceed to drop the present contempt proceeding in the light of the show cause dated 11.06.2024 read with Annexure A,B and C in the light of grievance of the petitioner, which is in the public interest. Reserving liberty to filing interlocutory application for reviving this order in the event of there is non-compliance to the orders of this court read with Annexure- A,B and C. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Alok Kumar Pandey, J) krishnakant/- U