Nitesh Kumar Shukla v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35499 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2021 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== NITESH KUMAR SHUKLA SON OF UPENDRA SHUKLA R/O VILLAGE- SONBARSA, P.S.- BATHNAHA, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. Allegation is of recovery of 45 litre of liquor from a motorcycle.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. It is next submitted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35499 of 2022(2) dt.22-08-2022 2/2 that petitioner is neither the owner nor the rider of the motorcycle and his name transpired in the confessional statement of Lav Kumar Jha which has no evidentiary value in the eye of law.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 40 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T