Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11623/2016bail granted

Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-03-09Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11623 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -557 Year- 2015 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Sonu Kumar Son of Suresh Ram resident of Village Bhagwanpur P.S. Nagar Thana Muzaffarpur District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shambhu Sharan Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Veena Kumari Jaiswal(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-03-2016 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 21.10.2015 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 212, 216, 399, 402 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code, 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution case is that on information that the miscreants are preparing to commit crime, raid was laid when from the possession of the petitioner one live cartridge was recovered whereas from the possession of other co-accused, arms and Ganja were recovered.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the investigation has already concluded. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11623 of 2016 (2) dt.09-03-2016 2/2 antecedent.

Considering the nature of recovery, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned VIth Addl. Sessions Judge cum Special Judge (NDPS Act), Muzaffarpur in connection with Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No. 557 of 2015.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra/- U T