Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13903/2016bail granted

Snehil Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-11Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13903 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -350 Year- 2015 Thana -GANDHIMAIDAN District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Snehil Ranjan son of Manoj Kumar Ojha, Resident of H/No.-17, Road No.-2, Shivpuri, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Samrendra Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kr.Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 11-05-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 420 and 379 of the I.P.C Allegedly, Ipad bearing IMEI No. 354424064396579 was taken away by one unknown person being the owner of mobile no. 9097438374. During investigation the petitioner was apprehended and he has confessed his guilt.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is in custody since 08.10.2015 but he has not been put on the test identification parade, nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioner and only on the basis of the criminal antecedent of the petitioner his prayer for bail has been rejected.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13903 of 2016 (3) dt.11-05-2016 2/2 The learned A.P.P. submits that from the face book the informant has given photo of the culprit which tallies with the petitioner, vide paragraph-45 of the case diary. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering detention of the petitioner, now he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M. Patna in Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 350 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T