Vidya Giri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39649 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2022 Thana- KARJA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Vidya Giri Son Of Late Devaki Giri Resident Of Village - Panapur Akhtiyarpur, Police Station - Karja, District - Muzaffarpur. 2.

Fulkeshari Devi Wife Of Vidya Giri Resident Of Village - Panapur Akhtiyarpur, Police Station - Karja, District - Muzaffarpur. 3.

Mukesh Giri Son Of Vidya Giri Resident Of Village - Panapur Akhtiyarpur, Police Station - Karja, District - Muzaffarpur. 4.

Amita Kumari @ Amita Daughter Of Vidya Giri Resident Of Village - Panapur Akhtiyarpur, Police Station - Karja, District - Muzaffarpur. 5.

Yamita @ Garita Kumari Daughter Of Vidya Giri Resident Of Village - Panapur Akhtiyarpur, Police Station - Karja, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Smita Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 30-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304B, 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioners are said to have committed murder of the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39649 of 2023(3) dt.30-11-2023 2/2 this case. He submits that the petitioners are the family members of the husband of the deceased. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He submits that the husband of the deceased has already been granted regular bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Karja P.S. Case No. 30 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T