← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36780/2024bail granted

Ganeshi Mandal @Ganesh Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-19Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36780 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-288 Year-2023 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ganeshi Mandal @Ganesh Mandal Son of Late Bahut Mandal @Vadur Mandal R/O village- Khutauna, P.S.- Benipatti, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Phool Devi W/O Ganesh Mandal R/O Village- Khatauna, P.S.- Benipatti, District- Madhubani.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-09-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 288 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 498A, 494 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation, the marriage of the informant was solemnized with the petitioner eighteen years ago. After marriage, the accused persons including the petitioner demanded dowry from the informant and on non-fulfillment of the same, the accused persons including the petitioner started torturing her and the petitioner has solemnized second marriage also.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36780 of 2024(4) dt.19-09-2024 2/3 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that the present case has been lodged after 20 years of the marriage which denotes that the complainant with the petitioner spent her life peacefully for a long period of 20 years and lodging of the complainant after a long span of time appears to be exaggerated story. He has also submitted that the children of the complainant appeared before the court of learned Sessions Judge and stated that their mother is not a good female and she has already married with an another male. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedent and is under custody since 07.02.2024.

5. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. The order of the learned trial court, it transpires itself that three children of the victim appeared before the court below and apprised the learned court below that their mother is not a lady of chastity. It has also been mentioned in the impugned order that she has solemnized marriage with another person.

7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36780 of 2024(4) dt.19-09-2024 3/3 rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Benipatti, Madhubani in connection with Complaint Case No. 288 of 2023, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T