← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3383/2018dismissed

Santu Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2019-09-24Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3383 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18069 of 2015 ====================================================== Santu Kumar Ram Son of Sri Ram Pujan Ram, Resident of VillageMangraon, P.S.-Nasriganj, District-Rohtas at Present R/o Mohalla-Setu Nagar, New Bypass Road, Anisabad, Patna-800002. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Deepak Kumar, Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna 2.

Sri Brijesh Mehrotra, The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

Sri Jitendr Srivastava, The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya. 4.

Sri Birendra Kumar Mishra, The Additional Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

Sri Gopal Prasad Singh The Under Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna 6.

Sri Alok Ranjan Ghosh, The District Magistrate, Jehanabad. 7.

Sri Ramesh KUmar Jha, The Additional Collector, Departmental Enquiry, Jehanabad.

8.

Sri Amitabh Verma, The Presenting Officer-Cum-Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Jehanabad.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 24-09-2019 As a consequence of the order of the writ court, petitioner has been reinstated in service by order dated 22.02.2019. Proceedings have been directed afresh against the petitioner in light of resolution dated 06.08.2019. Thus, it is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that he would be assailing the office order dated 16.07.2019 and

Patna High Court MJC No.3383 of 2018(4) dt.24-09-2019 2/2 other consequential orders in an appropriate proceedings. In view of substantial compliance of the order of the writ court, contempt petition is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) s.hassan/- U