Vijay Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16791 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -71 Year- 2013 Thana -PHENHARA District- EAST CHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Vijay Paswan, Son of Sri Ram Paswan, Resident of Village - Chamainia P.S . Shyampur Bhatha, District - Sheohar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Sharan Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 22-04-2015 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by the orders dated 24.9.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. 35495 of 2014 but had been granted liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It appears that now the charges have been framed. Considering the aforesaid, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 10 of 2015 arising out of Fenhara P.S. Case No. 71 of 2013, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16791 of 2015 (2) dt.22-04-2015 2/2 Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

The Court below is also directed to ensure that the present case is amalgamated with Chakia P.S. Case No. 350 of 2013 in terms of the earlier order since both the cases arise out of the same transactions.

(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T