Anandvardhan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13277 of 2016 (3) dt.27-06-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13277 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -144 Year- 2013 Thana -MAJORGANJ District- SITAMARHI ======================================================
1. Anandvardhan Singh son of Rajiv Singh @ Santan Singh, resident of Village- Barahi Hari Ram P.S. Majorganj, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shankar Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuradha Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 27-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No. 144 of 2013, G.R. No. 1985 of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and subsequently chargesheet has been submitted under Sections 396, 412 IPC and Section 3(II) (V) of SC/ST Act.
Allegedly, Manager of Punjab National Bank was going to deposit the money along with the informant, an Administrative Officer of Insurance Company and in the way, three un-known miscreants robbed and killed the Bank Manager. Submission is of false implication, he is not named in F.I.R, during investigation, the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused Saroj Singh, the petitioner is in custody since 25.07.2015 but he has not been put on TIP,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13277 of 2016 (3) dt.27-06-2016 nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession, without any material he has been remanded in this case whereas, other co-accused, namely, Saroj Kumar Singh, Arvind Kumar Singh and so many others have been allowed bail by different coordinate Benches of this Court. The learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner remained absconding.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is also directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Sitamarhi in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No. 144 of 2013, G.R. No. 1985 of 2013 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T