Sikindra Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38936 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-569 Year-2022 Thana- MINAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Sikindra Sahni Son of Kapildeo Sahni RESIDENT OF VILLAGEDHARPUR, P.S.- MINAPUR, DIST- MUZAFFARPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 10-07-2024 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No.569 of 2022 under Sections 341, 323, 147, 149, 379, 506 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against nine named accused persons including the petitioner against whom there is allegation of assault by lathi danda to informant's father due to which bleeding started and he died.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has no concern with the co-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38936 of 2024(2) dt.10-07-2024 2/2 accused persons.

5. Counsel also submits that antecedent of the petitioner is clean. He further submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and the specific allegation is against co-accused Virendra Sahni.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

7. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, therefore the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

8. However, trial court is directed to consider the regular bail application of the petitioner, if he surrenders within four weeks and prays for regular bail without being prejudice of the present order preferably on the same day. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T