Bechan Saday v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34757 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2025 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Bechan Saday S/O Late Domu Saday Resident of village- Jagatpur, PSRahika, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Prabhakar Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-09-2025 Heard both the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rahika P.S. Case No. 50 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26, 29, 30 and 35 of the Arms Act.
3. According to the prosecution story, the informant, who is a police official, alleged that on 25.02.2025, he received secret information about the sale and purchase of illegal arms taking place near the house of one Bechan Saday (petitioner). To verify the information, when the police reached near the house of petitioner they observed that some miscreants attempting to flee away. The petitioner was apprehended, and upon search of his house, the alleged arms and ammunition were recovered.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. Petitioner is never indulged in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34757 of 2025(4) dt.01-09-2025 2/2 business of sale and purchase of arms, he is not at all concerned with the recovered arms. Petitioner is an old man and he is never in touch with the arms gang for sale and purchase of the arms. One co-accused namely Ajay Paswan is indulged in the business of the arms and he kept the arms in the house of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that chargesheet has been submitted by the police against the petitioner in this case who is languishing in custody since 25.02.2025, having no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and considering the period under custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st, Madhubani in connection with Rahika P.S. Case No. 50 of 2025 subject to the condition that one of the bailor shall be his family member.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Ankit Kumar/- U T