Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21399/2015dismissed

Irshad Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2015-09-04Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21399 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -20 Year- 2015 Thana -CHANPATIA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Irshad Alam S/o Idrish Mian Resident of village - Sheoganj, P.S. Shikarpur, District - West Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gulnar Begum (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 04-09-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under sections 394, 307, 412 and 413 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant alleged that his brother Jitendra Kumar plies auto rickshaw on hire. Two persons hired his auto for going to Maria village but in between all the four accused persons tied the hands and feet of Jitendra Kumar and fled away with the auto rickshaw. The informant got the information and while he was going to see his brother, he saw the said auto rickshaw coming. One of the accused fired causing injury in the leg of the informant. All the four accused persons were apprehended and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21399 of 2015 (4) dt.04-09-2015 auto rickshaw was also recovered. The petitioner is one of the accused who was apprehended on the spot while fleeing away with the auto.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Chanpatiya P.S. Case No. 20 of 2015 pending in the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah. His prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected.

The learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the trial is not concluded within the time aforesaid, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Amin/- U