← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3448/2018disposed

Niraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Sunil Kumar Singh, Agriculture Production Commissioner, Bihar, Patna And

2023-11-03Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3448 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8548 of 2018 ====================================================== Niraj Kumar Son of Late Gaya Prasad, Resident of 39 New Punaichak, Near S.G. Tower, Hanuman Nagar, Punaichak, Police Station- Shastri Nagar, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through Sunil Kumar Singh, Agriculture Production Commissioner, Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sudhir Kumar, the Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Bihar, Patna.

3.

Manish Kumar Verma, The Principal Secretary, Planning and Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

4.

Sudhir Kumar, the Deputy Secretary, Planning and Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

5.

Rajeshwar Prasad Singh, Planning and Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

6.

Dinesh Prasad Singh, the Deputy Secretary, Agriculture Department, Bihar, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amit Kumar, Advocate Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sarvesh Kumar Singh - Aag 13 Mr. Rajat Kumar Tiwary, AC to AAG-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-11-2023 1.

The learned counsel for the contemnors seeks to file a supplementary show-cause on behalf of opposite party nos.1 and 2, which is taken on record. It is submitted that in compliance of the order dated 04.05.2018, passed in CWJC No.8548 of 2018, the petitioner has been granted notional promotion on the post of Assistant Director (Statistics), vide notification dated 02.11.2023, issued by the Deputy Secretary,

Patna High Court MJC No.3448 of 2018(20) dt.03-11-2023 2/2 Agriculture Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, which is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2.

In view of the aforesaid, nothing survives for consideration in the present contempt petition, hence the present petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U