← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33687/2026dismissed

Rohit Kumar Paswan @ Rohit Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-24Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33687 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-361 Year-2025 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria ====================================================== Rohit Kumar Paswan @ Rohit Paswan Son of Late Manik Paswan Resident of Village- Matiyari ward no. 10, P.S.- Mahalgaon, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Araria P.S. Case No.361 of 2025 registered for the offence under section 309(6) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3.

As per the prosecution case, the informant was waylaid by three miscreants at gunpoint who snatched two gold rings, a wallet containing Rs. 4,500/- and a gold locket from the informant.

4.

The petitioner is in custody since 03.12.2025 5.

The name of the petitioner has come during investigation for being involved in the said robbery on the basis of self-inculpatory statement of co-accused. He has been identified by the informant after seeing his photograph. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33687 of 2026(4) dt.24-07-2026 2/2 petitioner has two criminal antecedents also. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this bail application is rejected.

7.

It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Shalini/Pawan U T