Narad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40726 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2019 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL District- Begusarai ====================================================== NARAD YADAV Son of Anil Yadav Resident of Village- Raghunathpur Tihlu Tola, P.S.- Sahebpur Kamal, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 05-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 11 of 2019, instituted for the offence under Section(s) 399, 402 of Indian Penal Code, Sections 37(B), 37(C) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, Sections 25(1-b)A, 26 and 35 of Arms Act.

It is alleged in the written report that one loaded country made pistol and four live cartridges have been recovered from possession of the petitioner.

Petitioner is in custody since 8.1.2019.

Keeping in view the period spent by the petitioner in custody, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40726 of 2019(2) dt.05-07-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum Special Judge, Excise Act, Begusarai, in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 11 of 2019, subject to the condition that both the bailors will be close relatives of the petitioner with further conditions which are as follows:

(i) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court (ii) In absence on two consecutive dates without any valid reason, the bail bonds of the petitioner will liable to be cancelled and (iii) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that event, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. .

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T