Patna High CourtC. REV./387/2018dismissed

Tara Kant Sinha v. The Registrar Administrator , Patna High Court, Patna And ORS

2019-01-23The Chief Justice-,Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.387 of 2018 In Letters Patent Appeal No.659 of 2018 ====================================================== Tara Kant Sinha, son of Sri Bhupendra Narain Sinha, Resident of MohallaNakki Nagar (Kayasta Tola), P.O. & P.S.- Jamalpur, District- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Registrar (Administration), Patna High Court, Patna

2. The District & Sessions Judge, Nalanda, Bihar Sharif

3. The Judge Incharge (Administration), Nalanda, Bihar Sharif

4. Babloo Kumar, son of Sri Lakhan Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Naisarai, Post- Bihar Sharif, District- Nalanda, presently working as Sweeper, Civil Court, Bihar Sharif

5. Manju Devi, wife of Sri Balam Dom, resident of Mohalla-Saida Bazar (Kali Asthan), P.O. & P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prashant Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Piyush Lall, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) 23-01-2019 Re: I.A. No. 8702 of 2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

I.A. No. 8702 of 2018 has been preferred seeking condonation of delay of 15 days in filing of the review application.

We have gone through the reasons stated in the Interlocutory Application and for the reasons stated therein we are inclined to condone the delay. I.A. No. 8702 of 2018 is, thus,

Patna High Court C. REV. No.387 of 2018(3) dt.23-01-2019 2/2 allowed.

Re: Civil Review No. 387 of 2018 With the consent of the parties we have heard the review application itself on merit.

In the facts and circumstances of the case learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out any error apparent on the face of the record.

The Civil Review Application is, therefore, dismissed. (Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) P.K.P./- U