← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2647/2018disposed

Jay Prakash Mandal v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna And ORS

2019-02-08Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2647 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17419 of 2017 ====================================================== Jay Prakash Mandal S/o Late Ladu Mandal, Resident of Asanandpur, Quarter No. TH- 35, P.O.- Naya Bazar, P.S.- University APO, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna and Ors

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar.

3. The Director, Higher Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. Prof. Dr. Nalini Kant Jha, Vice Chancellor, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur, University, Bhagalpur.

5. Ashok Kumar Jha, The Registrar, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur, University, Bhagalpur.

6. Prof. Mohan Mishra, Head of Department Post Graduate Department of Sanskrit, Tilkamanjhi, Bhagalpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijay Shankar Choubey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey - Aag 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 08-02-2019 Earlier the writ petition was disposed of with direction to the Registrar to take final decision on the representation of the petitioner.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the University has filed show cause enclosing the order passed by the Registrar dated 15.12.2018.

Having regard to the fact that in compliance of the direction of the writ court, the Registrar of the University has passed order dated 15.12.2018, no further indulgence is required in the present proceeding. The present proceeding is drooped.

Patna High Court MJC No.2647 of 2018(4) dt.08-02-2019 2/2 The application stands disposed of. However, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to challenge the legality and validity of the order passed by the Registrar contained in Memo No. 93/18/931-934 in appropriate proceeding.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U