Laxuman Bind @ Laxman Bind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12465 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -71 Year- 2015 Thana -KARPI District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Laxuman Bind @ Laxman Bind S/o Mahendra Bind R/o Village - Khajuri, P.S. - Karpi, District - Arwal.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 04-05-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No. 71 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Poonam Kumari, the daughter of the informant, was married to the petitioner in the year 2010 and allegedly, due to non-fulfillment of demand of motor-cycle and gold chain, she was being abused and assaulted by the petitioner and other inlaws and ultimately, she was killed and her dead body was also made traceless.

Submission is of false implication and that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, he has got no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12465 of 2016 (3) dt.04-05-2016 2/2 criminal history, the wife of the petitioner died due to illness and other ailments, due information was given to the informant and the informant and his family members participated in the cremation but due to dirty village politics, lodged this case resulting the petitioner is suffering in custody since 15.05.2015 and in near future, the trial is not likely to be concluded. The learned A.P.P. seriously opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner is the husband and during investigation, the witnesses have supported the prosecution version.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the allegation attributed against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly, his such prayer stands rejected in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No. 71 of 2015, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arwal.

However, considering the detention of the petitioner, let the trial be expedited and concluded preferably within nine months after receipt or production of the copy of this order.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) ajaypd./- U T