Baba Narsingh Nath Industries Private Limited And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17861 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.
Baba Narsingh Nath Industries Private Limited, through its Director Manoj Kumar Singh, having registered office at Phulhara, House No. 101, Post Kalyanpur Chauk, District - Samastipur-848201. 2.
Manoj Kumar Singh, S/o Late Indrakant Kumar, Resident of VillagePhulhara , House No. 101, Post Kalyanpur Chauk, P.S. Kalyanpur, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Petitioners
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Industry Department, Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Zonal Manager, Allahabad Bank, Muzaffarpur. 3.
The Branch Manager, Main Branch, Allahabad Bank, Samastipur. 4.
Mr. Madan Mohan, the then Regional Assistant General Manager, Allahabad Bank Muzaffarpur.
5.
Mr. Ravi Kumar, Chief Manager, Zonal Office, Allahabad Bank, Muzaffarpur.
6.
Regional Zonal Manager, Allahabad Bank, Ranchi. 7.
Authorised Officer, Allahabad Bank, Branch, Samastipur. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Chittaranjan Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr.Sanjeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Res. Bank :
Mr.Dayanand Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr.Shiv Kumar, AC to GA-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 28-03-2019 When the matter is called out, at the outset, Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that he would seek withdrawal of the writ application with liberty to the petitioners to seek their remedy before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
The writ application is permitted to be withdrawn
Patna High Court CWJC No.17861 of 2018(4) dt.28-03-2019 2/2 with the liberty aforesaid.
In case the petitioners apply for statutory remedy before the appropriate forum and question of limitation arises, the same shall be considered keeping in mind that the petitioners were pursuing their remedy before this Court in the present writ application.
This writ application stands disposed off.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/-vedU