Dr. Ashish Sahay v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18631 of 2018 ====================================================== Dr. Ashish Sahay Son of Late Dr. Ajit Kumar Sahay, resident of B/56, Biscomaun Colony, P.S. Gulzarbagh, District/ Town- Patna- 800007. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Magadh University, Bodh Gaya- 824234 through its Registrar. 3.

The Vice- Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya- 824234. 4.

The Controller of Examination, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya 824234. 5.

The Dental Council of India, Aiwan-e-Ghalib Marg, Kotla Road, New Delhi- 110002 through its Secretary.

6.

Budhha Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Gandhi Nagar, P.S. Kankarbagh, Patna- 800020 through its Principal (at present Dr. Surendra Prasad).

7.

Dr. Prabhjot Singh, Son of Late Kulbir Singh, Singh Dental Clinic (opposite LCT ghat) near Mahavir Vatsalya Hospital, Patna- 800001. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ray Saurabh Nath, Advocate For the Magadh University :

Mr. Md. Faiz Ahmed, Advocate For the DCI :

Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 28-08-2023 I.A. No. 03 of 2023 has been filed to place on record the factum of compromise entered into between the parties and to allow the petitioner to withdraw the present writ application.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents has provided Cheque bearing No. 8000120341 dated 24.08.2023 drawn on Bank of Baroda in favour of the petitioner which has been handed over to Mr. Ray Saurav Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in

Patna High Court CWJC No.18631 of 2018(14) dt.28-08-2023 2/2 view of the compromise between the parties, he may be permitted to withdraw this application.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents are present and submit that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.

5. In the aforesaid view of the matter, this writ application is permitted to be withdrawn.

6. This writ application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) SUSHMA2/- U