Chandravansh Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary Forest Department Government Of Bihar Patna And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2243 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2016 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Rohtas ====================================================== Chandravansh Singh S/o- Late Gauri Shankar Singh, resident of VillageKanchanpur, P.S.- Dehri, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary Forest Department Government Of Bihar Patna 2.
The Principal Secretary, Forest Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.
The District Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram.
4.
The Authorised Officer cum Divisional Forest Officer Rohtas, Sasaram. 5.
The Forestar Tilauthu Sasaram Forest Circle.
... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, AC to GA 11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 22-07-2022 Today, once again no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ application.
It appears that after getting an order of release in terms of the order dated 20.12.2017 passed by this Court, the petitioner has lost his interest.
Learned counsel for the State submits that the vehicle in question has already been confiscated vide order dated 10.12.2016 passed by the competent authority in Confiscation Case No. 49 of 2016 but the said order of confiscation or the confiscation proceeding is not under challenge in the present writ application.
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.2243 of 2017(5) dt.22-07-2022 2/2 Be that as it may, since the petitioner is not pursuing the matter despite the earlier indulgence granted to him on 01.07.2022, this writ application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
The Authorised Officer-Cum-Divisional Forest Officer, Sasaram (Rohtas) shall proceed in the confiscation matter in accordance with law.
It will be open for the petitioner to seek his remedy against the order of confiscation before an appropriate court/authority in accordance with law.
The application stands disposed of accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) SUSHMA2/- U Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.