Upendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20862 of 2015 (2) dt.18-06-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.20862 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -512 Year- 2014 Thana -DANAPUR District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Upendra Paswan S/o Dr. R.P. Paswan, resident of village- Anand Bazar, P.S.- Danapur, Distt- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shambhu Sharan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.Haque Sahara(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 18-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State as well as Mr. Suraj Narain Prasad Sinha, learned counsel for the informant.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 307 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleged that when she had gone to attend the call of nature, the petitioner, Upendra Paswan, his wife, Anandi Devi and daughter Sweta Kumari caught her. Upendra Paswan assaulted her with bat. Anandi Devi and Sweta Kumari assaulted her with bricks and wicket which hit on her right hand and above the right eye. The informant did not disclose in the first information report that which injury was caused on account of assault made by the petitioner.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20862 of 2015 (2) dt.18-06-2015 Mr. Suraj Narain Prasad Sinah, learned counsel appearing for the informant submits that on account of assault made by the petitioner, Upendra Paswan, one lacerated injury was caused just above the eye brow and the same is opined to be grievous in nature.
From a perusal of the injury report as well as the statement of the informant, it appears that Anandi Devi assaulted the informant which caused injury on her right hand and Sweta Kumari assaulted her which caused injury on her right eye brow and the same is opined to be grievous in nature. The informant has not stated in the first information report that on account of assault made by the petitioner, she has sustained injury on which part of her body.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Danapur in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No.512 of 2014. V.P.Sinha/- (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) U