← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1031/2016disposed

Smeatons Project Private Ltd. v. The Union Of India And ORS

2016-09-21Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1031 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14203 of 2015 =========================================================== Smeatons Project Private Ltd. Goriya Toli, Station Road, Patna-800001 through its Project-in-charge .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India

2. J.K. Mohapatra Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Government of India, New Delhi.

3. The State of Bihar

4. Binay Kumar, Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Works, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. Kamlesh Kumar Chaudhary, Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6. Raghubir Prasad, Executive Engineer, Works Division Hajipur, Rural Works Department, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Opposite Parties =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rabi Bhushan Prasad No. 1, Adv. For the State : Mr. Apurva Kumar, AC to GA-4 For the Union of India : Dr. Punam Kumari Singh, CGC =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 21-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties.

2. The present petition has been filed for initiating a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 27.11.2015 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14203 of 2015 requiring the authorities to consider the petitioner's case and taking decision at their end.

3. A show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party nos. 5 and 6 Annexure-A whereof being an order dated 09.02.2016

Patna High Court MJC No.1031 of 2016 dt.21-09-2016 2/2 discloses that a final decision has been taken by the authorities and thus it is submitted that the order of this Court stands complied with.

4. In the above view of the matter, MJC No. 1031 of 2016 stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner that in case it is aggrieved by the order of the authorities as noticed above, it may agitate the same before an appropriate forum in accordance with law, if so advised.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 22.09.2016 Transmission Date N.A.