Indradeo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13781 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -455 Year- 2015 Thana -WAJIRGANJ District- GAYA ====================================================== Indradeo Yadav, Son of Ramswarup Yadav, Resident of village- Tola Baijda, P.S.- Meskaur, District- Nawada.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivendra Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehata, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 455 of 2015, registered under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act.
The accusation is of recovery of one loaded pistol from the possession of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Further submission is that while petitioner is accused in Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 409 of 2014 under Section 307 and other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code, but he is on bail in that case. The petitioner is in custody since 04.11.2015.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13781 of 2016 (2) dt.25-04-2016 2/2 Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 455 of 2015. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the parents / close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner and further to furnish correct address. The petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T