Sakir Hussain v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34888 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2024 Thana- KARPI District- Arwal ====================================================== Sakir Hussain S/o Aas Mohammad Resident of Village- Rohai, P.S.- Karpi, Dist.- Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Nityanand Neeraj For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-05-2026 The matter has been taken up today through video conferencing.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
3. The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Karpi PS Case No 200 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126 (2), 115 (2), 118 (1), 117 (2), 109, 352, 3 (5) of the BNS.
4. As per the allegation, the petitioner is alleged to have assaulted on the head of the father of the informant by means of iron rod.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties and the present case has been lodged in retaliation to the case lodged by the petitioner's side. It has further been submitted that there is no premeditation to kill and the occurrence took place suddenly on a trivial issue. It has also been submitted that the injury
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34888 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026 2/2 sustained by the father of the informant is simple in nature and the said injuries are abrasions. It has further been submitted that there was free fight between the parties. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedents.
6. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
7. Heard the parties and perused the record.
8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Arwal, in connection with Karpi PS Case No 200 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.
9. This application stands allowed.
(Praveen Kumar, J) M.E.H./- U T