← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18471/2017dfd for non appearance

Md. Ashraf Ali And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-12-18Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18471 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Md. Ashraf Ali and Anr Son of Md. Kasim, Resident of Village Mau Dhaneshpur, P.S. Vidyapatinagar, District- Samastipur. 2.

Md. Harun, Son of Md. Idrish, Resident of Village- Mau Dhaneshpur, P.S. Vidyapatinagar, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Secretary, Primary Education, Department of HRDD, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Commissioner, Darbhanga Pramandal, Darbhanga. 5.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

6.

The District Programme Officer, Samastipur.

7.

The Block Development Officer, Vidyapatinagar, Samastipur. 8.

The Block Education Extension Officer, Vidyapatinagar, Samastipur. 9.

The District Teacher Appellate Authority Samastipur. 10.

Md. Jamil Akhtar, Son of Jalaluddin, Resident of village- Bamaura, P.S. Vidyapatinagar, District- Samastipur.

11.

Abdul Kayum Ansari, Son of Md. Salim Ansari, Resident of VillageSugapakar, P.S.- Musarigharari, District- Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.A.R.Pandey -Aag15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-12-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent-State and learned counsel for the private respondent are present.

3. By previous order dated 20.11.2025, this matter was adjourned by way of last chance making it clear that if on

Patna High Court CWJC No.18471 of 2017(4) dt.18-12-2025 2/2 the next date, the petitioners are not interested in pressing the writ application then this Court may consider dismissing it for non-prosecution. Today again when the case is called out, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ application. Hence, in light of previous order dated 20.11.2025, the case is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Gaurav Sinha/- U