Chandan Poddar @ Chandan Paudar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36897 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2025 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== Chandan Poddar @ Chandan Paudar son of Late Bhola Poddar @ Late Bhola Paudar R/o - Kathrbanni, Ward No.10, P.S - Rosera, District - Samastipur, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 50 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, the petitioner threatened informant's family to withdraw a pending case against him. It is further alleged that later in the evening, the petitioner attacked the informant with a sickle injuring his nose.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36897 of 2025(2) dt.19-06-2025 2/2 incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the allegation levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. There is a previous land dispute between the parties. It is further submitted that the injury received by the informant is simple in nature. The petitioner is in custody since 20.02.2025 and has got three criminal antecedents in which he is on bail.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 50 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T