Arvind Paswan @ Arbind Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34961 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2018 Thana- KHAGAUL District- Patna ====================================================== ARVIND PASWAN @ ARBIND PASWAN Son of Late Ram Prit Paswan R/o Mangal Akhada, P.S.- Malsalami, District -Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ghanshyam Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out, by the office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S.Tr. No.582/2018 arising out of Khagaul P.S. case No.86 of 2018 registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of A.D.J.-1, Danapur, District Patna.

The earlier bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure 1 to the present application taking into account that the petitioner happens to be the assailant. A report was called for from the trial court. It has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34961 of 2022(3) dt.12-10-2022 2/2 reported that out of six prosecution witnesses, four prosecution witnesses have already been examined and the trial is likely to be concluded within a period of four months.

Considering the nature of accusation and the stage of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The same is rejected.

The Trial Court is directed to take all necessary steps to conclude the trial at the earliest.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T