Sachin Paswan @ Sachin Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33814 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-493 Year-2025 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Sachin Paswan @ Sachin Kumar Paswan S/O Udho Paswan R/O village -Piparpanti Kewata, Ward no-11, P.S- Dalsinghsarai, Dist- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 14-05-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The accused/petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Dalsingsarai P.S. Case No. 493 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 121(1), 121(2), 118(1), 132, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

3. As per FIR, petitioner alleged to assault and also to use criminal force to deter informant who is a public servant from discharging of his duty when he arrived to village of petitioner to arrest the accused persons of Dalsinghsarai P.S. Case No. 366 of 2025.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33814 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026 2/3

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that no overt act appears attributed to this petitioner and he was implicated only for the reason that he is co-villager of accused for search of whom police came to village. It is pointed out that implication of petitioner appears only on the basis of suspicion as his name was supplied by local chaukidar. While concluding the argument, it is further submitted that no injury was caused to any of the public servant/police personnel during the occurrence, which negate the allegation of assaulting and also of using criminal force to constitute the alleged offence.

5. Explaining criminal antecedent, it is pointed out that petitioner found involved in one more criminal case, where he is on bail.

6. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

7. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of fact as petitioner appears implicated prima facie on the basis of suspicion, accordingly, above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33814 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026 3/3 order, is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st, Dalsingsarai, District- Samastipur/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Dalsingsarai P.S. Case No. 493 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) veena/- U T