Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35222/2020dismissed

Lalta Singh @ Lalita Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2021-01-25Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35222 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2019 Thana- ADHAOURA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Lalta Singh @ Lalita Prasad son of Shri Nath Singh R/o village Garkey, P.S. Adhoura, District Kaimur at Bhabua.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 25-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Adhaoura P.S. Case No. 16 of 2019 for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 325, 504, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, having earlier been rejected by this Court by order dated 02.07.2019 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 39259 of 2019.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that other co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail , but the petitioner was denied in view of specific accusation of assault causing dislocation of the right shoulder of the informant. It is further submitted that a compromise has since been reached between the parties.

4. Learned APP appears and has been heard.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35222 of 2020(2) dt.25-01-2021 2/2

5. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court sees no reason to take a different view in the matter at this stage. The petition stands dismissed.

6. If the petitioner surrenders and seeks regular bail before the learned Court below the same shall be considered on its own merit in accordance with law and without being prejudiced by any observation in the present order.

7. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T