Sujeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34836 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-625 Year-2021 Thana- PATLIPUTRA District- Patna ====================================================== SUJEET KUMAR Son of Arjun Yadav Resident of Village - Kurji More, Gate No. 65. Police Station- Digha, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-09-2022 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial Case No. 281 of 2022 arising out of Patliputra P.S. Case No. 625 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402 of the IPC and Sections 25(1-B)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of one loaded country made pistol and four live cartridges from the pocket of petitioner besides Rs. 210/- and one mobile of Nokia company.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34836 of 2022(2) dt.05-09-2022 2/2 petitioner is in custody since 27.11.2021 and bears criminal antecedent of two cases in which one case is of similar nature. He further submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the basis of criminal antecedent of similar nature.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation and the material available on record, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner stands rejected. However, if the trial is not concluded within six months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. (Alok Kumar Pandey, J) shahzad/- U T