Kirtiman Thapa v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1259 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4766 of 2009 ====================================================== Kirtiman Thapa, son of late Ganesh Bahadur Thapa, Ex-Chaukidar Electric Supply Division Saharsa, Power House Colony, At, P.O.& District-Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Sri Sandip Paundrik, Energy Department, Sichai Bhawan, Kranti Marg, Patna-1
2. Sri Sandip Paundrik, Chairman-cum-Managing Director Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
3. Smt.Kriti Kiran Company Secretary, Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
4. Sri Balram Singh, Electrical Superintending Engineer Incharge of Koshi Area Electric Supply At&P.O. District-Saharsa. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nilesh Kumar Nirala For the Opposite Party no.1 : Mr. Satyendra Rai, AC to SC-30 For the Opposite Party nos.2to4: Mr.Ratan Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-03-2015 When the matter has been taken up for consideration on merit, a counter affidavit on behalf of the Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. is being filed, after service of its copy upon the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, stating therein that the order dated 15.04.2013 passed in CWJC No.4766 of 2009 by this Bench has already been complied with. According to learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties in the light of the order of this Court the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment was considered, but by a reasoned and speaking order dated 10.06.2014 (Annexure-D to the aforesaid counter affidavit) the claim of the petitioner has been rejected.
In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present MJC application is disposed of as it has become infructuous.
Patna High Court MJC No.1259 of 2014 (2) dt.11-03-2015 However, if the petitioner is so aggrieved, a liberty is granted to him to challenge the validity and correctness of the aforesaid order dated 10.06.2014 (Annexure-D to the aforesaid counter affidavit) in an appropriate proceeding before the appropriate forum/court.
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Arvind/- U