Ranjesh Kumar @ Bhura v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35451 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2021 Thana- PIPRA District- Patna ====================================================== Ranjesh Kumar @ Bhura S/O Vishwanath Prasad Resident Of Village- Dehiri, P.S.- Pipra, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sucheta Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 28-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Pipra P.S. Case no. 32 of 2021 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 461, 379 & 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of theft of several electronic articles including Sony Camera, Lamination machine, Canon Pixma Printer, one monitor of H.C.L. Company, Panasonic Camera, Wooden box and CPU of ANTEC Company from the shop of the informant.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35451 of 2022(2) dt.28-11-2022 2/2 offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail and submitted that as per the seizure list several stolen articles were recovered from the house of petitioner which were theft from the shop of informant.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the recovery has been made from the house of petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and, as such, his application for bail is rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail, the same may be considered by the court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order of rejection.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T