Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45648 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1116 Year-2024 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== Ranjan Kumar S/o Krishna Prasad @ Vinod Yadav @ Murari Singh @ Krishna Murari Singh @ Vinod Kumar Resident off- At Present Bihta Mahadev Sthan, P.S.- Bihta, Dist.- Patna Permanent- Village- Teni Bigha, P.S. and District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Mayank Singh, Advocate Mr. Mickey Singh, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sameer Kumar, Advocate Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Binod Kumar No. 3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-07-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 303(2) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, informant alleged that on 02.12.2024 at about 4 PM, his motorcycle was stolen by this petitioner on the basis of forged parking slip.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45648 of 2025(2) dt.29-07-2025 2/2 this case merely on the basis of disclosure made by parking staff. The alleged stolen motorcycle has not been recovered from this petitioner.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he stole the motorcycle of informant. Petitioner has got three criminal antecedents of similar nature.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation, specific and direct nature of accusation and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T