Sarfaraj @ Sarfaraj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38752 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2024 Thana- POTHIYA District- Kishanganj ====================================================== 1.

SARFARAJ @ SARFARAJ SON OF SHAH MOHAMMAD @ SAHID VILLAGE- KHAT KHALI, PS- KURLIKOT, DIST- KISHANGANJ 2.

MD. SARIF SON OF ALAM VILLAGE- KHAT KHALI, PS- KURLIKOT, DIST- KISHANGANJ 3.

SHAMSHAD ALAM @ SAMSAD SON OF SAMSUL @ SALMU VILLAGE- GULSHAN BHITA, KURLIKOT, PS- KURLILOT, DISTKISHANGANJ ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Bhola Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-08-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, allegation against these petitioners is to commit loot of cattle of informant who was carrying the seized cattle in connection with Kurlikot P.S. Case No. 16 of 2024.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of these petitioners. Petitioners claim

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38752 of 2024(4) dt.22-08-2024 2/2 clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that these petitioners are named in the F.I.R. and there is specific allegation against them of committing loot of seized cattle.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and nature of accusation, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T