Nitin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32938 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2025 Thana- CHACKMEHSI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Nitin Kumar Son of Indrakant Jha @ Indrkant Jha Resident of village - Simri Gopal, Police Station - Chakmehsi, District - Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashank Shekhar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 22-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner makes a prayer for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(4),392 of BNSS Act.

3. The allegation in the FIR is that the informant after collecting an amount of Rs.75,480/- while he was returning back home, four persons on two motorcycle snatched away the money on the point of knife.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR is against unknown and the name of the petitioner has transpired during the course of investigation on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Abhishek Kumar. As a matter of fact, with respect to the recovery, it has been stated that an amount

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32938 of 2025(2) dt.22-05-2025 2/2 of Rs. 4,000/- and a mobile phone has been recovered from the petitioner but it is stated that the same belongs to the petitioner and is not the subject matter of the present crime. The petitioner is not put on T.I parade and the charge sheet has been submitted in this case. The petitioner has clean antecedent and is in custody since 31.01.2025. It has also been pointed out that the co-accused has already been granted bail vide order dated 28.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 23322 of 2025.

5. The learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above name petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/ successor court in Chakmehsi P.S. Case No. 10 of 2025, subject to the following condition:- (i) The petitioner shall appear before the trial court on each and every date till framing of charge.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) N.K/- U T