Manoj Kumar @ Dhananjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35285 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2018 Thana- HULASGANJ District- Jehanabad ====================================================== MANOJ KUMAR @ DHANANJAY KUMAR S/o Mathura Prasad Resident of Village- Lalse Bigha, Post- Dhangawa, P.S.- Jehanabad, DistrictJehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dhaneshwar Vashist, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ajay Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 196, 197, 198, 199, 201, 120(B) / 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner that he took the job of primary teacher on the basis of forged certificate and fraudulently took the name of Dhananjay Kumar also fabricated false documents by the name of Dhananjay Kumar.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35285 of 2022(2) dt.27-09-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. Petitioner has no concern with Dhananjay Kumar. The alleged enquiry was conducted without giving proper opportunity to the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner has resigned from the services. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the petitioner has resigned, let him be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No.183 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.Pc.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ravishankarkr/- U T