Deepak Kumar @ Dipak Kumar @ Radhe @ Radhey @ Radhey Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34841 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2025 Thana- TETERHAT District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Deepak Kumar @ Dipak Kumar @ Radhe @ Radhey @ Radhey Kumar S/o Naresh Sao @ Naresh Saw @ Naresh Shaw R/o Village - Tetarhat, P.S - Tetarhat, District - Lakhisarai, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Shankar Roy, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Shyam Kr. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 11-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the Pulsar motorcycle of the informant was stolen by some unknown persons on 15.12.2025.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the First Information Report was lodged against unknown miscreants and the name of the petitioner transpired in the present case on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused in Tetarhat P.S. Case No. 25 of 2026 dated 08.02.2026. It is pointed out that the recovery of the stolen motorcycle has also been made from the possession of these

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34841 of 2026(3) dt.11-06-2026 2/3 accused persons who were riding the same as would be evident from the seizure list itself. So far as the petitioner is concerned, the seizure list indicates that only one mobile phone was recovered from the possession of this petitioner which belonged to the petitioner himself. The petitioner has been languishing in custody since 28.02.2026 and the charge-sheet has been submitted. Further, the petitioner had no criminal antecedent and only after the present case, another case being Tetarhat P.S. Case No. 25 of 2026 was lodged on 08.02.2026 wherein, the petitioner was arrested and remanded in the present case.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and the charge-sheet has been submitted, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-III, Lakhisarai/concerned Court below in connection with Tetarhat P.S. Case No. 231 of 2025, subject to the conditions:-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34841 of 2026(3) dt.11-06-2026 3/3 (i) One of the bailors shall be a family member/close relative.

(ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) priyanka/- U T