← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/759/2022withdrawn

Shambhu Prasad Nayak v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Home Deparntment Of Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

2022-12-15Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.759 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Samastipur ====================================================== SHAMBHU PRASAD NAYAK S/o Late Fekan Nayak Resident of Loknathpur Ganj, Dalsinghsarai, P.S.- Dalsinghsarai, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Home Deparntment of Govt. of Bihar, Patna. Bihar 2.

the Superintendent of Police, Samastipur. Bihar 3.

The Officer in- Charge, Dalsinghsarai Police Station, District- Samastipur. Bihar 4.

Sahdeo Gupta S/o- Late Krishna Dev Prasad Gupta Resident of Loknathpur Ganj Under Nagar Parishad Dalsinghsarai, Ward No.11, P.S.- Dalsinghsarai, District- Samastipur.

5.

Smt. Bebi Gupta W/o Sahdeo Gupta Resident of Loknathpur Ganj Under Nagar Parishad Dalsinghsarai, District- Samastipur. 6.

Kailash Nayak S/o Late Fekan Nayak Resident of Loknathpur Ganj Under Nagar Parishad Dalsinghsarai, District- Samastipur. 7.

Kundan Kumar S/o Sri Kailash Nayak Resident of Loknathpur Ganj Under Nagar Parishad Dalsinghsarai, District- Samastipur. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Achintya Anand, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Saroj Kumar Sharma, A.C. to A.A.G.-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 15-12-2022 The matter has been mentioned by learned counsel for the petitioner for urgent hearing.

In course of mentioning, it transpires that this writ application has been filed directly in this Court for a direction to the respondent authorities to register a First Information Report. Learned counsel for the petitioner admits at the Bar that the petitioner has not moved under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. in the

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.759 of 2022(2) dt.15-12-2022 2/2 court of learned C.J.M.

This being the position.

Keeping in view the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu versus U.P. and Ors. reported in (2008) 2 SCC 409, this Court would not entertain this writ application for lodging of the First Information Report. Petitioner has remedy open which he may apply. With this liberty, this writ application is disposed of. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) vats/- U T