Arjun Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32551 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2019 Thana- BARAULI District- Gopalganj ====================================================== ARJUN PRASAD Son of Late Nagina Prasad, Resident of Village- Hajiapur, Ward No. 22, P.S.- Gopalganj Town, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Naresh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Barauli P.S. Case No. 112 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under sections 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
The police on secret information raided and recovered huge quantity of illegal liquor from a shed room standing in the brick kiln and the person, who was arrested from there, has stated that he is partner of brick kiln. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from the impugned order it does not appear that the petitioner was in any way attached with the illegal trade of liquor. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32551 of 2019(2) dt.16-05-2019 2/2 the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Gopalganj in connection with Barauli P.S. Case No. 112 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T