Vijay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34664 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2026 Thana- ISLAMPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

Vijay Yadav S/o Late Ramashish Yadav R/o Village- Chulhan Bigha, PSIslampur, District- Nalanda 2.

Dewanti Devi W/o Vijay Yadav R/o Village- Chulhan Bigha, PS- Islampur, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case in connection with Islampur P.S. Case No. 95 of 2026 dated 13.03.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 127(6), 140(3) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the allegation, informant's daughter solemnized marriage with co-accused Antesh Kumar and after marriage, petitioners along with co-accused persons assaulted his daughter and gave threatening to kill her. Thereafter, these petitioners and husband of the informant's daughter took his daughter to hospital on the pretext of treatment, but she did not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34664 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026 2/3 return.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 happens to be the father-in-law and mother-in-law respectively of the deceased and there is general and omnibus allegation against them. It has further been submitted that the husband of the deceased is in judicial custody and the said fact has been stated in paragraph No. 17 of anticipatory bail application. It has further been submitted the there is no eye-witness to the alleged occurrence and the chargesheet has been submitted 238, 103(1), 3(5) of B.N.S. without any basis.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Heard the parties and perused the record.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Islampur P.S. Case No. 95 of 2026, subject to conditions as laid down under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34664 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026 3/3 section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Praveen Kumar, J) shivam/- U T