Rajan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9734 of 2022 ====================================================== Rajan Kumar Son of Binod Chaudhari, Resident of Village- Repura, P.O. Jaitpur, Gram Panchayat- Rampur Vishwanath, P.S. Saraiya (Jaitpur O.P.), District- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary,Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 4.
The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur. 5.
The Deputy Development Commissioner, Muzaffarpur, DistrictMuzaffarpur. 6.
The Block Development Officer, Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. 7.
The Block Pramukh, Block Panchayat Samiti, Saraiya, DistrictMuzaffarpur. 8.
The Panchayat Samiti, Member of territorial constituency falling under Gram panchayat Raj, Rampur Bishwanath of Block Panchayat Samiti, Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice /Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also, the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences /offices.) Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Ajay (GA5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ) Date : 22-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-
Patna High Court CWJC No.9734 of 2022 dt.22-07-2022 2/3 After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not to be in favour with the submissions made across the
Patna High Court CWJC No.9734 of 2022 dt.22-07-2022 3/3 Bar, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that petitioner be permitted to take recourse to such equally, efficacious alternative remedies as are otherwise available in law, including the MANREGA Scheme.
Permission granted.
We clarify that we have not adjudicated the dispute on merits. All questions of fact and law are left open to be agitated and adjudicated before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
As and when such proceeding is initiated, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date Transmission Date NA