Bhuneshwar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12021 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.
Dhananjay Singh son of Late Harendra Singh, resident of VillagePaharichak, Police Station- Sonepur, District- Saran. 2.
Sunil Kumar son of Himalaya Narayan Prasad, resident of VillageSabbalpur Bhabhan Toli, Police Station- Sonepur, District- Saran. 3.
Lagan Deo Pandey, son of Girija Pandey, resident of Village- Sahbajpur, Police Station- Hajipur, District- Vaishali.
4.
Surendra Prasad Singh son of Sri Bireshwar Prasad Singh, resident of Village- Bithauli, Police Station- Bhagwanpur, District- Vaishali. 5.
Raghuwar Giri son of Ram Dahin Giri, resident of Village- Nathanpura, Police Station- Tarwara, District- Siwan.
6.
Shiva Nath Rai son of Ram Parikshan Rai, resident of Village- Chandoura, Police Station- Amnaur, District- Saran.
7.
Kapildeo Rai son of Sri Bhadai Rai, resident of Village- Paharichak, Police Station- Sonepur, District- Saran.
8.
Ramji Sah son of Parikshan Sah, resident of Village- Rasulpur Kotigaon, Police Station- Bhagwanpur, District- Vaishali. 9.
Rameshwar Singh son of Late Kameshwar Singh, resident of VillageKartaha, Police Station- Kartaha, District- Vaishali. 10.
Nand Kishor son of Sri Rameshwar Thakur, resident of Village- Katra, Police Station- Hajipur, District- Vaishali.
11.
Bachcha Rai son of Late Mahavir Rai, resident of Village- Semra, Police Station- Sonepur, District- Saran.
12.
Sanjay Kumar, son of Shambhu Sharma, resident of Village- Sabbalpur Bhabhan Toli, Police Station- Sonepur, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Commissioner-Cum- Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Jai Prakash University Chapra, through its Registrar. 4.
The Vice- Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra Saran. 5.
The Registrar, Jai Prakash University Chapra Saran. 6.
Purvottar Railway Sonepur, Saran Chapra.
7.
The Secretary, Purvottar Railway College, Sonepur, Saran Chapra. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 96 of 2018
Patna High Court CWJC No.12021 of 2017(3) dt.07-11-2025 2/3 ====================================================== Bhuneshwar Yadav Son of Ram Sohag Rai Resident of Village- Sabalpur Newal Tola, P.O. Sonepur, District- Saran at Present Working as Physical Training Instructor P.T.I Purvottar Railway College, Sonepur, Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Commissioner-Cum -Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.
The Jai Prakash University, Chapra through its Registrar, Chapra. 4.
The Vice-Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, Saran. 5.
The Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, Saran. 6.
Purvottar Railway College, Sonepur, Saran.
7.
The Secretary, Purvottar Railway College, Sonepur, District- Saran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12021 of 2017) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Adv For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Madanjeet Kumar -Gp20 (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 96 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Adv For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Kameshwar Kumar-Gp17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondent-State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the petitioners had built the case on the basis of letter dated 05.12.2008 (Annexure-9) issued by the Human Resources Department of the State Government and the said letter, as per the learned counsel for the petitioners, has been withdrawn during the pendency of the present case. This fact has been highlighted by the respondent-State in paragraph 21 of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.12021 of 2017(3) dt.07-11-2025 3/3 counter affidavit.
3. In view of the aforesaid development, the present writ applications have become infructuous and it is accordingly dismissed.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) kiran/- U