Mohfil Ravidas @ Mofil Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36263 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2005 Thana- DHORAIYA District- Banka ====================================================== Mohfil Ravidas @ Mofil Ravidas S/O Bangtu Ravidas @ Bangtu Das R/O Village-Resident of Birmiya, P.S.- Dhoriya, Distt-Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S.T. No. 493 of 2024 arising out of Dhoraiya P.S. Case No. 115 of 2005 instituted for the offence under Sections 307/149, 147, 148, 341/149, 323/149, 324/149 & 379/149 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Prosecution case in short is that on 01-12-2005, coaccused persons, including the petitioner came at the house of the informant with lathi and danda and threatened him to kill for lodging case against the petitioner.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 04-12-2024. Petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36263 of 2025(2) dt.19-06-2025 2/3 bears one criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that petitioner was declared absconder on 02-05-2019 by the Court below and thereafter he was arrested by the police. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner. Charge is also framed in this case. Learned counsel submits that petitioner is a man of means and not likely to abscond, if enlarged on bail.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and charge being framed, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with S.T. No. 493 of 2024 arising out of Dhoraiya P.S. Case No. 115 of 2005, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36263 of 2025(2) dt.19-06-2025 3/3 family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T