← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35109/2022allowed

Gonour Paswan @ Ganaur Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-21Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35109 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Vaishali ====================================================== GONOUR PASWAN @ GANAUR PASWAN SON OF RAM KISHUN PASWAN R/O VILLAGE- SAHDULLAPUR, P.S.- GANGA BRIDGE, DISTRICT- VAISHALI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

MIRJA DEVI WIFE OF GNOUR PASWAN @ GANAUR PASWAN R/O VILLAGE- SAHDULLAPUR, P.S.- GANGA BRIDGE, DISTRICTVAISHALI AND D/O- NANDLAL PASWAN, AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- HASANPUR AUSTI, P.S.- MAHUWA, DISTRICTVAISHALI ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yugal Kishore, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under sections 498(A), 506/34 of the IPC.

Petitioner, who is husband of the informant, is said to have committed torture upon the informant in association of his family members due to no child was born to her. They also assaulted and ousted here from her matrimonial home.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has never made any dowry demand and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to grudge. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and he is ready and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35109 of 2022(3) dt.21-11-2022 2/2 willing to keep his wife with full honour and dignity. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182. In that view of the matter, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No.03 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T