Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15786 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -39 Year- 2013 Thana -MAHILA PS District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Vikash Kumar Son of Talkeshwar Singh Resident of Village - Kurre, P.S.- Ghoshi, District - Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shakir Ahmad(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 29-06-2016 This is an application, made under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking bail for the accusedpetitioner, namely, Vikash Kumar, in connection with Jehanabad Mahila Police Station Case No. 39 of 2013, under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Perused the above application and materials on record.

Heard Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Shakir Ahmad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the State. In view of the fact that the accused above-named has been in custody since 31.07.2015 in connection with the case aforementioned and though charge sheet has been submitted, and perusal of the materials available on record does not reveal such

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15786 of 2016 (2) dt.29-06-2016 2/2 incriminating materials, which would warrant further detention of the accused-petitioner in custody, and in view also of the fact that the perusal of the materials does not reveal that the accusedpetitioner's liberty on bail would adversely affect his trial, it is, in the interest of justice, hereby directed that the accused abovenamed shall be released on bail of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties, each of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Jehanabad, in connection with Jehanabad Mahila Police Station Case No. 39 of 2013, corresponding to Sessions Trial No.219 of 2015. This direction for bail is further subject to the condition that the accused above-named shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence and shall appear, in the learned Court below, as may be directed.

In terms of the above observations and directions, this bail application shall stand disposed of.

Mkr./- (I.A. Ansari, ACJ.) U T