Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35183 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2026 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West Champaran ====================================================== Rohit Kumar S/o Mathura Prasad Resident of Village- Ramgarhwa Bazar, P.S.- Ramgarhwa, Dist.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sitesh Kashyap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bettiah P.S. Case No. 147 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(2)/317(4)/317(5) B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, during the checking of vehicles, the petitioner was found driving a motorcycle, and it was revealed that the said motorcycle was stolen one.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that the petitioner was not aware that the motor cycle in question was a stolen property.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35183 of 2026(4) dt.17-07-2026 2/2 It has further been submitted that the search and seizure is in violation of Section 105 of B.N.S.S. It has further been submitted that the case is triable by learned Magistrate, nevertheless, charge sheet has been filed against the petitioner and there is no allegation of tampering against him. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 10.03.2026 and although he is accused in one another case, but not of similar nature.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Heard the parties and perused the record.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances and parity of the case, let the petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah P.S. Case No. 147 of 2026 .

8. The application stands allowed.

(Praveen Kumar, J) Sahil/- U T