Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37519/2024dismissed

Govind Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-12Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37519 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2022 Thana- ROH District- Nawada ====================================================== Govind Yadav SON OF CHHOTELAL YADAV R/O- VILL- KAJICHAK, P.S- ROH, DIST- NAWADA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-07-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in the present case registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 31.01.2024.

4. The following order was passed on 31.01.2024 by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 3403 of 2024:- "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 209 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37519 of 2024(2) dt.12-07-2024 2/2 petitioner has assaulted the victim on his head several times and the victim was admitted to Pawapuri Medical College from where he was referred to P.M.C.H., Patna.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case and he petitioner is in jail since 10.10.2023.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and the allegations levelled against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner

7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed for the present.

8. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner. If there is no sufficient progress in the trial of the petitioner then the petitioner may renew his prayer for grant of bail."

5. I see no reason to review my earlier order. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is rejected.

6. The Investigating Agency is directed to produce the injury report in the court below.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T