Jai Ram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16058 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2016 Thana -BIHARSHARIF District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Jai Ram Yadav, Son of Bindeshwari Yadav, Resident of VillageMadanchak, Police Station- Bind, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 20-06-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 19 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-A), 25 (1-B) A and 26 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, two country made katta and twenty five cartridges were recovered from possession of the petitioner besides cash of Rs. 24,000/-.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, he is suffering in custody since 14.01.2016, he has been sufficiently penalized and, as such, now he deserves sympathetic consideration to which the learned APP opposes.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16058 of 2016 (5) dt.20-06-2016 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner shall be released on bail after completion of six months in custody from the date of his remand on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharshariff in connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 19 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Mishra/- U T